AI challenge
AI challenge
Article 29 of the Federal Constitution states that everyone has the right, in judicial or administrative proceedings, to have his or her case treated fairly and decided within a reasonable time; this principle is enshrined in article 36 of the Federal Act on the General Part of Social Insurance Law, which states that persons called upon to render or prepare decisions on rights or obligations must disqualify themselves if they have a personal interest in the case or if, for other reasons, they appear to have been prejudiced.In addition, article 15 of the Geneva Administrative Procedure Act specifies that members of the authorities called upon to render or prepare a decision must disqualify themselves if there are circumstances likely to cast doubt on their impartiality, for example if they are relatives or allies of a party or if they are united by marriage, engagement, registered partnership or are in fact living as a couple. In such circumstances, the person handling the case has a duty to withdraw. If the member of the authority does not act spontaneously, it is possible to request his or her recusal by applying directly and without delay to the authority concerned.In this case, you are referring to an increase in the number of legal proceedings from which it can logically be deduced that they have found in favour of the person handling your case and have not granted you the benefits you are seeking. Although several judges, courts and appeal authorities have for years confirmed the correctness of the decisions you are complaining about, the chances of success of an application for recusal seem slim to say the least.
